Friday, May 31, 2013

Sheepish Journalists Beget Obama's Abuses Of Power

A week ago, the Washington Post editorial board felt compelled to remind its readers that “the press must have the ability to ask questions.” That editorial was in reaction to two known occasions when the Department of Justice accessed the phone records and emails of journalists who did dare to ask questions. The Post was defending the constitutional right of journalists to conduct investigative journalism, even if it causes discomfort to the most powerful man on Earth.

Of course, if the Post and its liberal news media brethren hadn’t allowed this right to atrophy over the last five years, then its editors wouldn’t have had to remind people that freedom of the press still exists.

Press harassment was just one of the myriad scandals that have erupted in recent weeks. In the meantime, Barack Obama sandwiched Scandalpalooza with two speeches in which he argued for Americans yielding ever more control of their lives to an all-powerful federal government whose benevolence should not be questioned.

He advised Ohio State University’s graduating class to ignore those who warn of government’s tendency to drift toward despotism. “They'll warn that tyranny is always lurking just around the corner. You should reject these voices.”

Well, among those who warned against tyranny were Thomas Jefferson and the Founding Fathers. And no, for you victims of modern education, Thomas Jefferson and the Founding Fathers was not the name of a doo-wop band from the fifties.

Three weeks later, during his commencement address at the US Naval Academy, Obama claimed that distrust of big government contributed to a “cynicism that threatens our democracy.” But in truth, distrust and cynicism should be part of the normal immune response that protects a healthy democracy from abuses of power such as those we’ve seen lately.

In the interval between those two speeches, State Department whistleblowers, who had been bullied into silence by their superiors, exposed the web of deception woven by the upper levels of the Obama administration to conceal their own incompetence and to appease apologists for Islamic terrorism.

We learned that Obama’s IRS specifically targeted conservatives and Republican-allied issue advocacy organizations. Obama claims that he learned about it from the newspapers even though everybody around him seems to have known about it for months.

In each case, every excuse and explanation crumbled in the face of hard evidence.

The liberal media might have played along if the Department of Justice had not abused the 1917 Espionage act to secretly gain access to phone records of Associated Press reporters. The AP reported on a successful counter terrorism operation in Yemen. As a result, the cover of a critical British intelligence asset in the area was blown.

But according to the Washington Post, the AP withheld information regarding the Yemen operation until assured by the CIA that it was safe to release the story. But in releasing the information, the AP preempted Barack Obama’s plan to incorporate the operation’s success into his reelection campaign. And that could not go unpunished.

In addition, the Justice Department gained access to Fox News reporter James Rosen’s telephone records and personal emails. Rosen had reported that North Korea would react belligerently to tighter economic sanctions. That’s a secret? Who didn’t know that? To convince a judge to permit that access, Justice accused Rosen of criminal conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act.

Eric Holder watched James Rosen more closely than Tamerlan Tsarnaev.

Obama has used the Espionage Act to harass journalists more than all previous presidents combined.

In both cases, Attorney General Eric Holder claimed ignorance of the subpoenas. He claimed under oath that he had no part in the Rosen subpoena. Subsequent revelations have shown that Holder was intimately involved in the pursuit of the Rosen subpoena, even to the point of shopping for a judge who would grant him a secret subpoena.

An investigation was indicated. So Obama assigned Holder to investigate himself.

If that doesn’t leave you cynical and distrustful, then you’re part of the problem.

The news media hew closely to the liberal narrative that organizations such as the NRA, the Tea Party and others who defend the United States Constitution are fringe kook extremist weirdos who deserve ostracism and ridicule. So perhaps they would be well advised to consider the words of one of their historical heroes, Edward R. Murrow. After witnessing the rise of European fascism he observed that, “A nation of sheep begets a government of wolves.”


Update: It's not the first time that Obama has seen fit to investigate himself.

Thursday, May 30, 2013

Build Your Own Unregistered AR-15, Legally.


Friday, May 03, 2013

Thanks To Obama, The Muslim World Hates America Even More

Remember when Obama promised that his election would make the Muslims love us? It hasn't quite worked out that way.
Obama has presided over an America that, in many respects, is now even more unpopular in the Muslim world than it was under George Bush and Dick Cheney. 

That is simply a fact. Poll after poll has proven it. In July, 2011, the Washington Post reported: "The hope that the Arab world had not long ago put in the United States and President Obama has all but evaporated." Citing a poll of numerous Middle East countries that had just been released, the Post explained: "In most countries surveyed, favorable attitudes toward the United States dropped to levels lower than they were during the last year of the Bush administration."

A 2011 Arab American Institute poll found that "US favorable ratings across the Arab world have plummeted. In most countries they are lower than at the end of the Bush Administration, and lower than Iran's favorable ratings." The same year, a poll of public opinion in Egypt - arguably the most strategically important nation in the region and the site of Obama's 2009 Cairo speech - found pervasively unfavorable views of the US at or even below the levels of the Bush years. A 2012 Pew poll of six predominantly Muslim nations found not only similar or worse perceptions of the US as compared to the Bush years, but also documented that China is vastly more popular in that part of the world than the US. In that region, the US and Israel are still considered, by far, to be the two greatest threats to peace.

In sum, while Europeans still adore Obama, the US is more unpopular than ever in the Muslim world. A newly released Gallup poll from Thursday, this one surveying public opinion in Pakistan, provides yet more powerful evidence of this dangerous trend. As Gallup summarized: "more than nine in 10 Pakistanis (92%) disapprove of US leadership and 4% approve, the lowest approval rating Pakistanis have ever given". Worse, "a majority (55%) say interaction between Muslim and Western societies is 'more of a threat' [than a benefit], up significantly from 39% in 2011." Disapproval of the US in this nuclear-armed nation has exploded under Obama to record highs: