The Democrats' Texas Savior Can't Handle The Truth
Seriously. It's detrimental to her mental health.
Davis said in her lawsuit that the newspaper ran “a series of
contrived and false news stories and editorials…with malicious intent.”
The lawsuit said “defamatory and libelous” remarks were made to inflict
emotional distress and to deny her rights to free speech, assembly and
association.
It said that “Davis has suffered and is continuing to suffer damages to
her mental health, her physical health, her right to pursue public
offices in the past and in the future, and to her legal career.” She
sought unspecified damages, including “significant exemplary damages.”
One really has to stop and soak in the idea that Wendy Davis, a pure
media creation attempting to translate her 15 minutes of pink-sneakered
fame into a ticket to the Governor's mansion, once sued a newspaper for
hurting her feelings.
Actually, the paper wasn't being unfair at all, it was pointing out that she was a sleazy candidate. From National Review:
Specifically cited [in the lawsuit[ is a Star-Telegram editorial
published the day of the runoff election between Davis and opponent
Cathy Hirt, whom the paper had endorsed. The editorial expressed
“disappointment” at an opposition-research flier that Davis’s campaign
had circulated in the days leading up to the election and that, among
other things, attacked Hirt for failing multiple times to pass the
Tennessee bar exam and raised questions about whether Hirt had practiced
law in Texas illegally.
Davis didn't like the Ft. Worth paper pointing out that she was
fighting "dirty and with innuendo" (Cathy Hirt had a doctorate) so she
sued them. The lawyer who defended the paper said of the incident "I have never seen anything like it before or since."
No comments:
Post a Comment