Lefty Democrat Charles Lane Wants His Party to get a Divorce from Public Employee Unions.
Anti-progressive.
The labor peace justification tries to make a virtue out
of something Americans normally, and properly, despise: government by
interest group. A variant of that argument, advanced by my colleague Harold Meyerson,
is that public-employee unions, with their large campaign donations
and political staffs, have become “the all-around linchpin of the modern
Democratic Party” and the progressive causes for which it stands.
Some of us, though, don’t think dependence on unions has been healthy
for the Democratic Party or for the robust public sector it espouses.
Again, the case in point is the public schools, which employ almost half of all local government employees but which Democrats dare reform only at the risk of war with teachers unions.
Also, California’s powerful prison guard union has provided key support for that state’s “three strikes and you’re out” mandatory life sentence law. Not progressive.
No comments:
Post a Comment