Feeding the Hungry Equals "Exploitation?"

Feeding the Hungry Equals "Exploitation?"
Environmentalists are exposing themselves for what they really are, simple-minded opponents of progress and resenters of success. The United States is trying to feed the starving with genetically engineered foods. These foods have a number of advantages that should appeal to environmentalists. They require far less insecticide as they have their own defenses engineered in. Secondly, they can produce more food per acre, allowing marginal land to return to a wild state.
But the green weenies are fighting genetically engineered crops and European protectionists are allying themselves with these lunatics. They claim that GMO's (genetically modified organisms) have not been proven safe. How much proof is required? Nobody has ever been injured by a GMO, which gives them a far better safety record than peanuts or unchlorinated municipal water.
The United States is trying to give GMO's to nations ravaged by famine and the Eurogreenies are fighting it. Why? Because if millions of African consume GMO's without detriment to their health, it will drive the final nail in the coffin of their arguments against GMO's.
The Eurogreenies would rather see Africans die than GMO's on grocery store shelves.
Are they racist?