What Is It With The Clintons And The Truth
Hillary tells a useless lie. Why? Is it because she knows no other way? I think it's just a reflex.
During yesterday's Des Moines Register debate, the moderator asked Clinton: "As president, would you use signing statements to assert that certain acts of Congress conflict with your interpretation of the Constitution and your obligation to enforce those laws?"
The senator responded: "I would use them the way presidents before this president used them. They were used to clarify the law to perhaps make it more coherent with other laws that have been passed. And along came President Bush. He's used them as essentially a form of veto. He did it through a piece of legislation I passed, where it was pretty simple. I said: If you're going to have a FEMA director, it should be somebody with experience handling emergencies ... we actually had to pass it through the Congress. And when George Bush signed the bill it was part of, he specifically used a signing statement to say, 'I don't have to follow that, unless I choose to."
But knowledgeable Senate sources say that is not what happened. Clinton never "passed" the legislation to do this.
Labels: Hillary's Reflexive Lying
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home