Thursday, July 05, 2012

No, Obama Was Not Outspent In 2004

Just another brazen lie. Does he think that no one will bother to look this stuff up? Oh yeah! He's right, when it comes to ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, The New York Times, The Washington Post, etc, etc, etc...
President Barack Obama on Thursday claimed he was outspent in his 2004 Senate election race, even though he had almost six times as much money as his opponent.

“I got outspent when I ran [the] first time for Senate,” he claimed as he was ending his heated campaign-trail speech in Maumee, Ohio.

Obama was misleading.

The Federal Election Committee’s website shows that Obama’s campaign claimed $14,807,432 in donations by December 2004.

In contrast, his opponent, Alan Keyes, had only $2,545,325, according to the FEC.
That’s a six-fold advantage for Obama, not a deficit.

The imbalance in funding was the largest in that year’s Senate races, according to a 2006 book, “In The Election After Reform: Money, Politics, and the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act.”


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home