New York Times Keeps Inspector General Scandal From Its Readers

I don't have to try hard to imagine how the New York Times would have reacted had George Bush, or any other Republican president illegally fired an Inspector General to benefit a friend and political ally. Unfortunately, I don't have to imagine how the Times would behave in the current case of Barack Obama doing just that.
The answer is nothing.

The New York Times has not yet published a single word about Barack Obama's illegal dismissal of Gerald Walpin.

This is, unfortunately, par for the course. The New York Times spiked the Obama/ACORN illegal campaign coordination story just as it was about to climax with revelations that might have cost Obama votes. New Yorkers who rely exclusively on the Times for their news still have no idea that their senior senator was involved in a politically motivated, illegal identity theft scandal.

I guess this latest story hasn't seen the light of day because it hasn't been spoon fed by Obama to the Times.