But most of the decline started before she started hectoring people. These people believe that we lift up a prayer of thanks to them when the sun rises.
While Mrs. Obama credits “Let's Move” for these recent advances, the report from Robert Wood Johnson does not back up that assertion. Here is a chart from the report that the White House refers to in its press release and from which Mrs. Obama took Mississippi's 13 percent decline:
The 13 percent decrease that Mrs. Obama touted is measured from Spring 2005 through Spring 2011. “Let's Move” was launched in February 2010, so the first five years of the time period in question were prior to Let's Move's existence. The time period for New York City is similar, but the Philadelphia and California figures only extend through 2010, ending just as “Let's Move” got moving.
While the Robert Wood Johnson report demonstrates progress has been made in the struggle against childhood obesity, there's no proof yet that “Let's Move” has played a role, and the report does not mention the program. While “Let's Move” has undoubtedly raised the profile of the issue, the White House will have to wait for the studies to catch up to its claims. Even then, a direct correlation between any change in obesity rates and “Let's Move” will be difficult to verify. But if the White House continues to cite outdated statistics to promote the success of “Let's Move,” Mrs. Obama's credibility may be diminished before current figures on childhood obesity become available.
While
Mrs. Obama credits “Let's Move” for these recent advances, the report
from Robert Wood Johnson does not back up that assertion. Here is a
chart from the report that the White House refers to in its press
release and from which Mrs. Obama took Mississippi's 13 percent decline:
The 13 percent decrease that Mrs. Obama touted is
measured from Spring 2005 through Spring 2011. “Let's Move” was launched
in February 2010, so the first five years of the time period in
question were prior to Let's Move's existence. The time period for New
York City is similar, but the Philadelphia and California figures only
extend through 2010, ending just as “Let's Move” got moving.
While the Robert Wood Johnson report demonstrates
progress has been made in the struggle against childhood obesity,
there's no proof yet that “Let's Move” has played a role, and the report
does not mention the program. While “Let's Move” has undoubtedly
raised the profile of the issue, the White House will have to wait for
the studies to catch up to its claims. Even then, a direct correlation
between any change in obesity rates and “Let's Move” will be difficult
to verify. But if the White House continues to cite outdated statistics
to promote the success of “Let's Move,” Mrs. Obama's credibility may be
diminished before current figures on childhood obesity become
available.
- See more at:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/white-house-stats-childhood-obesity-decline-pre-date-lets-move_704845.html#sthash.GDFlLoMl.dpuf
While Mrs.
Obama credits “Let's Move” for these recent advances, the report from
Robert Wood Johnson does not back up that assertion. Here is a chart
from the report that the White House refers to in its press release and
from which Mrs. Obama took Mississippi's 13 percent decline: - See more
at:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/white-house-stats-childhood-obesity-decline-pre-date-lets-move_704845.html#sthash.GDFlLoMl.dpuf
While
Mrs. Obama credits “Let's Move” for these recent advances, the report
from Robert Wood Johnson does not back up that assertion. Here is a
chart from the report that the White House refers to in its press
release and from which Mrs. Obama took Mississippi's 13 percent decline:
The 13 percent decrease that Mrs. Obama touted is
measured from Spring 2005 through Spring 2011. “Let's Move” was launched
in February 2010, so the first five years of the time period in
question were prior to Let's Move's existence. The time period for New
York City is similar, but the Philadelphia and California figures only
extend through 2010, ending just as “Let's Move” got moving.
While the Robert Wood Johnson report demonstrates
progress has been made in the struggle against childhood obesity,
there's no proof yet that “Let's Move” has played a role, and the report
does not mention the program. While “Let's Move” has undoubtedly
raised the profile of the issue, the White House will have to wait for
the studies to catch up to its claims. Even then, a direct correlation
between any change in obesity rates and “Let's Move” will be difficult
to verify. But if the White House continues to cite outdated statistics
to promote the success of “Let's Move,” Mrs. Obama's credibility may be
diminished before current figures on childhood obesity become
available.
- See more at:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/white-house-stats-childhood-obesity-decline-pre-date-lets-move_704845.html#sthash.GDFlLoMl.dpuf
While
Mrs. Obama credits “Let's Move” for these recent advances, the report
from Robert Wood Johnson does not back up that assertion. Here is a
chart from the report that the White House refers to in its press
release and from which Mrs. Obama took Mississippi's 13 percent decline:
The 13 percent decrease that Mrs. Obama touted is
measured from Spring 2005 through Spring 2011. “Let's Move” was launched
in February 2010, so the first five years of the time period in
question were prior to Let's Move's existence. The time period for New
York City is similar, but the Philadelphia and California figures only
extend through 2010, ending just as “Let's Move” got moving.
While the Robert Wood Johnson report demonstrates
progress has been made in the struggle against childhood obesity,
there's no proof yet that “Let's Move” has played a role, and the report
does not mention the program. While “Let's Move” has undoubtedly
raised the profile of the issue, the White House will have to wait for
the studies to catch up to its claims. Even then, a direct correlation
between any change in obesity rates and “Let's Move” will be difficult
to verify. But if the White House continues to cite outdated statistics
to promote the success of “Let's Move,” Mrs. Obama's credibility may be
diminished before current figures on childhood obesity become
available.
- See more at:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/white-house-stats-childhood-obesity-decline-pre-date-lets-move_704845.html#sthash.GDFlLoMl.dpuf
While
Mrs. Obama credits “Let's Move” for these recent advances, the report
from Robert Wood Johnson does not back up that assertion. Here is a
chart from the report that the White House refers to in its press
release and from which Mrs. Obama took Mississippi's 13 percent decline:
The 13 percent decrease that Mrs. Obama touted is
measured from Spring 2005 through Spring 2011. “Let's Move” was launched
in February 2010, so the first five years of the time period in
question were prior to Let's Move's existence. The time period for New
York City is similar, but the Philadelphia and California figures only
extend through 2010, ending just as “Let's Move” got moving.
While the Robert Wood Johnson report demonstrates
progress has been made in the struggle against childhood obesity,
there's no proof yet that “Let's Move” has played a role, and the report
does not mention the program. While “Let's Move” has undoubtedly
raised the profile of the issue, the White House will have to wait for
the studies to catch up to its claims. Even then, a direct correlation
between any change in obesity rates and “Let's Move” will be difficult
to verify. But if the White House continues to cite outdated statistics
to promote the success of “Let's Move,” Mrs. Obama's credibility may be
diminished before current figures on childhood obesity become
available.
- See more at:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/white-house-stats-childhood-obesity-decline-pre-date-lets-move_704845.html#sthash.GDFlLoMl.dpuf